Yellow Foot Prints Forums  
 

Go Back   Yellow Foot Prints Forums > Yellow Foot Prints News [Main Page] > The Polling Booth

The Polling Booth [Main Page]
Join in with your ratings and opinions to posted polls.

View Poll Results: If you had the option, would you choose the sex of your future child?
yes 5 21.74%
no 13 56.52%
are you kiddin 5 21.74%
Voters: 23. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-21-2006, 07:49 AM
THE LADY J's Avatar
THE LADY J THE LADY J is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: N.E. WISCONSIN
Posts: 137
Question the sex of your future child?

If you had the option, would you choose the sex of your future child?
__________________
THE LADY J

The grass withers and the flowers fall, but the Word of God stands
forever." Isaiah 40:8
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-21-2006, 07:54 AM
THE LADY J's Avatar
THE LADY J THE LADY J is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: N.E. WISCONSIN
Posts: 137
Designer Babies? Many Want Embryo Screening

Designer Babies? Many Want Embryo Screening
Many Clinics Let Parents Choose Child's Sex

POSTED: 7:31 am CDT September 21, 2006

Email This Story | Print This Story
Sign Up for Breaking News Alerts


Boy or girl? Almost half of U.S. fertility clinics that offer embryo screening say they allow couples to choose the sex of their child, the most extensive survey of the practice suggests.


Sex selection without any medical reason to warrant it was performed in about 9 percent of all embryo screenings last year, the survey found.


Another controversial procedure -- helping parents conceive a child who could supply compatible cord blood to treat an older sibling with a grave illness -- was offered by 23 percent of clinics, although only 1 percent of screenings were for that purpose in 2005.


For the most part, couples are screening embryos for the right reasons -- to avoid passing on dreadful diseases, said Dr. William Gibbons, who runs a fertility clinic in Baton Rouge, La., and is president of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology, which assisted with the survey.


"There are thousands of babies born now that we know are going to be free of lethal and/or devastating genetic diseases. That's a good thing," he said.

However, the survey findings also confirm many ethicists' fears that Americans increasingly are seeking "designer babies" not just free of medical defects but also possessing certain desirable traits.

"That's a big problem if that's true," Boston University ethicist George Annas said of the sex selection finding. "This is not a risk-free technique," he said referring to in vitro fertilization, which can over-stimulate a woman's ovaries and bring the risk of multiple births.

"I don't think a physician can justify doing that to a patient" for sex selection alone, Annas said.

Survey results were published on the Internet Wednesday by the medical journal Fertility and Sterility and will appear in print later.

The survey was led by Susanna Baruch, a lawyer at Johns Hopkins University's Genetics and Public Policy Center in Washington, D.C., with the cooperation of the reproductive medicine society. It involved an online survey of 415 fertility clinics, of which 190 responded.

They were asked about pre-implantation genetic diagnosis, or PGD, which can be done as part of in vitro fertilization, when eggs and sperm are mixed in a lab dish and the resulting embryos implanted directly into the womb. In PGD, a single cell from an embryo that is three to five days old is removed to allow its genes and chromosomes to be analyzed.

About 1 of every 20 in vitro pregnancy attempts in the United States last year used PGD, the survey found.

Two-thirds of the time it was to detect abnormalities that would keep the embryo from developing normally and doom the pregnancy attempt.

In 12 percent of cases, PGD was used to detect single-gene disorders like those that cause cystic fibrosis. Three percent of cases were to detect problems that mostly affect males, because they have only one copy of certain genes.

However, these cases are different from those done purely for gender preference. A whopping 42 percent of clinics that offer PGD said they had done so for non-medically related sex selection. Nearly half of those clinics said they would only offer sex selection for a second or subsequent child.

"That's really startling," University of Pennsylvania ethicist Arthur Caplan said of the high number of PGD for sex selection alone. "Family balancing seems like a morally persuasive reason to some people," but doing gender selection just because a couple doesn't want any girls, or any boys, is troubling, he said.

One doctor who offers it takes a different view.

"It performs a much desired service. We're making people happy," said Dr. Jeffrey Steinberg, medical director of Fertility Institutes, which has clinics in Los Angeles, Las Vegas and Guadalajara, Mexico.

Many countries ban PGD or restrict it to prevention of serious inherited diseases. Many people from foreign countries travel to the United States to obtain it, especially from countries like China and Canada.

Baruch said the survey was intended to get a realistic view of what was going on.

"This is the first time anyone has tried to quantify how often PGD is done and what it's being offered for," she said. Many Want Embryo Screening
Many Clinics Let Parents Choose Child's Sex


Boy or girl? Almost half of U.S. fertility clinics that offer embryo screening say they allow couples to choose the sex of their child, the most extensive survey of the practice suggests.


Sex selection without any medical reason to warrant it was performed in about 9 percent of all embryo screenings last year, the survey found.


Another controversial procedure -- helping parents conceive a child who could supply compatible cord blood to treat an older sibling with a grave illness -- was offered by 23 percent of clinics, although only 1 percent of screenings were for that purpose in 2005.


For the most part, couples are screening embryos for the right reasons -- to avoid passing on dreadful diseases, said Dr. William Gibbons, who runs a fertility clinic in Baton Rouge, La., and is president of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology, which assisted with the survey.


"There are thousands of babies born now that we know are going to be free of lethal and/or devastating genetic diseases. That's a good thing," he said.

However, the survey findings also confirm many ethicists' fears that Americans increasingly are seeking "designer babies" not just free of medical defects but also possessing certain desirable traits.

"That's a big problem if that's true," Boston University ethicist George Annas said of the sex selection finding. "This is not a risk-free technique," he said referring to in vitro fertilization, which can over-stimulate a woman's ovaries and bring the risk of multiple births.

"I don't think a physician can justify doing that to a patient" for sex selection alone, Annas said.

Survey results were published on the Internet Wednesday by the medical journal Fertility and Sterility and will appear in print later.

The survey was led by Susanna Baruch, a lawyer at Johns Hopkins University's Genetics and Public Policy Center in Washington, D.C., with the cooperation of the reproductive medicine society. It involved an online survey of 415 fertility clinics, of which 190 responded.

They were asked about pre-implantation genetic diagnosis, or PGD, which can be done as part of in vitro fertilization, when eggs and sperm are mixed in a lab dish and the resulting embryos implanted directly into the womb. In PGD, a single cell from an embryo that is three to five days old is removed to allow its genes and chromosomes to be analyzed.

About 1 of every 20 in vitro pregnancy attempts in the United States last year used PGD, the survey found.

Two-thirds of the time it was to detect abnormalities that would keep the embryo from developing normally and doom the pregnancy attempt.

In 12 percent of cases, PGD was used to detect single-gene disorders like those that cause cystic fibrosis. Three percent of cases were to detect problems that mostly affect males, because they have only one copy of certain genes.

However, these cases are different from those done purely for gender preference. A whopping 42 percent of clinics that offer PGD said they had done so for non-medically related sex selection. Nearly half of those clinics said they would only offer sex selection for a second or subsequent child.

"That's really startling," University of Pennsylvania ethicist Arthur Caplan said of the high number of PGD for sex selection alone. "Family balancing seems like a morally persuasive reason to some people," but doing gender selection just because a couple doesn't want any girls, or any boys, is troubling, he said.

One doctor who offers it takes a different view.

"It performs a much desired service. We're making people happy," said Dr. Jeffrey Steinberg, medical director of Fertility Institutes, which has clinics in Los Angeles, Las Vegas and Guadalajara, Mexico.

Many countries ban PGD or restrict it to prevention of serious inherited diseases. Many people from foreign countries travel to the United States to obtain it, especially from countries like China and Canada.

Baruch said the survey was intended to get a realistic view of what was going on.

"This is the first time anyone has tried to quantify how often PGD is done and what it's being offered for," she said.
__________________
THE LADY J

The grass withers and the flowers fall, but the Word of God stands
forever." Isaiah 40:8
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-21-2006, 08:00 AM
o'boot's Avatar
o'boot o'boot is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: N.E. WISCONSIN
Posts: 461
DAM JUST MY 2 CENTS WORTH
__________________
I've learned that I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy it.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-26-2008, 10:18 PM
drfenders
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
OMG, i'm going to have a PUPPY!!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
I love my future Marine! IloveBrad Future Marines 3 02-14-2008 04:20 PM
Marine In Iraq Witnesses 1st Child Born Sunshine Open Channel 0 11-08-2007 10:01 AM
Navy's future ride cmyr Announcements/Updates 2 12-21-2006 01:04 PM
Marines bring smiles, relief, hope for the future to refugees MARINE42 Marines Only 0 12-18-2006 03:40 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright & Copy 2006-2019, Yellow Foot Prints, All Rights Reserved